Difference between revisions of "Assela Pathirana"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<div style="padding: .4em .9em .9em" id="MainPageBox1"> | <div style="padding: .4em .9em .9em" id="MainPageBox1"> | ||
{| | {| | ||
|[[Image:145-4575_IMG.JPG|thumb|350px]] | |[[Image:145-4575_IMG.JPG|thumb|350px]]| | ||
|{{Template:What the heck is that thing on top left?}} | |{{Template:What the heck is that thing on top left?}}| | ||
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 12:29, 31 March 2006
Random musings on various topics: Climate and water security, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), IT tools, Computer programming and Web-Applications, Citizen Science, ... Views are personal!
|
What is newMediawiki for personal webs(22:09, 27 March 2006 (JST)) About Wikis, the site mediawiki says the following:
So these packages are meant to be used for sites that are intended for collaboration, probably with contributions from thousands of individuals, like the case of wikipedia. The success of wikipedia shows that this indeed is a workable model. What about using wikimedia for a personal web site. Well, I wanted to do this, mainly because I was lazy, but still needed to boast that I have a personal web site. In late nineties I had a web site. But the main reason why it was not a sustainable project was that it was written using a WYSIWYG software, that makes life extremely easy, the first few times that you work on a new site, but makes it impossibly hard when you want to make a small changes and add a few lines here and there! During my experiments with Wikis (that's another story for another day.) I realized that these Wikis are extremely flexible to grow, although they may have a bit steep learning curve initially. Particularly I liked mediawiki, the software behind the legendary wikipedia. |